wow

Goose-bumps. I'm struggling to compose my thoughts let alone a complete sentence so please, bear with me. I've spent the last few hours reading a wealth of information (most of it is sourced and credible, whatever that means in this day and age) regarding Flight 77's doomed destiny with The Pentagon on 9/11. Pentagonresearch.com is a very well designed site with countless photos and documents but keep in mind that the authors of the site do not agree with the 'official' story of 9/11, so you'll have to be the judge.
Here are a few bits of info that caught my eye:
- Construction of The Pentagon began in 1941 -- on 11 September.
- "At Freeway Airport in Bowie, Md., 20 miles west of Washington, flight instructor Sheri Baxter instantly recognized the name of alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour when the FBI released a list of 19 suspects in the four hijackings. Hanjour, the only suspect on Flight 77 the FBI listed as a pilot, had come to the airport one month earlier seeking to rent a small plane.
However, when Baxter and fellow instructor Ben Conner took the slender, soft-spoken Hanjour on three test runs during the second week of August, they found he had trouble controlling and landing the single-engine Cessna 172. Even though Hanjour showed a federal pilot's license and a log book cataloging 600 hours of flying experience, chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard declined to rent him a plane without more lessons." Click here for more
- The only video released to the public showing Flight 77 hitting The Pentagon was captured by a Pentagon security camera. Regarding the footage:
"We have 5 frames which cover a 4 second period. The first 2 frames occur in the same second, the third frame is 2 seconds later, the fourth frame is 1 second after that, and the fifth frame is another second after that. This means that many frames are missing including any that show a clear profile of the aircraft."
Other nearby security cameras captured the impact as well but the FBI seized this footage immediately. Click here for more
- Exit hole evidence? I don't even know what to think about these pics. Find them here and here.
- Also, I discovered this link which features all of the Government's evidence in the US vs. Moussaoui trial. This piece of 'evidence' is simply unbelievable -- literally. The Government alleges that a red bandana, completely in tact and in perfect condition, was recovered from the Flight 93 wreckage in Pennsylvania. In Flight 93, the A & E original film, the hijackers are shown wearing red bandanas once they begin their jihad mission so I'm assuming the Gov't believes the bandana belonged to one of the hijackers. But give me a break. The plane practically disintegrated on impact yet a bandana, a hijacker's bandana, survived. Wow.
- And finally, I discovered this article from Time magazine , originally posted on 12 September 2001. The piece claims that a 911 call was made "from a man who said he was locked in the rest room aboard United Flight 93. Glenn Cramer, the dispatch supervisor, said the man was distraught and kept repeating, "We are being hijacked! We are being hijacked!" He also said this was not a hoax, and that the plane "was going down." Said Cramer: "He heard some sort of explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane. Then we lost contact with him." Since then, that account has been disputed and the 911 operator has been barred from speaking to reporters.
Additionally, that call was received at 9:58 am. The cockpit voice recorder ends at 10:03:09 yet in 2002, the world's best known forensic seismologist, Terry Wallace, told the Daily News that the evidence was conclusive that the plane crashed nearly three minutes later, at 10:06:05. Click here for more

Look, I tend to believe the Government's story regarding the horrific events of 9/11 but I must admit that there are some looming questions...Holes in the official story.
But I am certain of one thing: 2,986 people needlessly lost their lives that day and they should never be forgotten.

mc

Also check out:
9/11 Truth
2,986 Faces